…The extension of a deep-rooted conspiracy to sideline him.
By Shariff Aminu Ahlan
It is outrageous, disturbing, unimaginable, undeserved, and simply difficult to comprehend how such a high-profile and well-attended event, organized to celebrate media excellence and promote discussions on strengthening media platforms that advance the Northern agenda, could deliberately exclude the Commissioner for Information of the host state, a man widely acknowledged as one of the most competent and outstanding Information Commissioners in Northern Nigeria.
The wave of criticism that followed the event was massive and centered on several noticeable shortcomings, including poor coordination, misplaced priorities, organizational lapses, and a lack of professionalism. However, the most ironic aspect of the entire event was the deliberate exclusion of the State Commissioner for Information.
As the summit was organized under the leadership of the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media, the apparent lapses and alleged collaboration with disgruntled elements pursuing hidden agendas ultimately diminished what should have been a historic gathering. Despite the presence of governor, commissioners of information from various states, media practitioners, academics, and other distinguished personalities, the event failed to make the impact many had anticipated.
To be fair, the organizers made considerable efforts to ensure the summit achieved its objectives. The discussions focused on Northern Nigeria and explored practical ways through which the media could contribute to the region’s development by promoting constructive narratives, intellectual engagement, and effective information dissemination.
Unfortunately, avoidable organizational shortcomings prevented the event from fully meeting expectations. More importantly, the exclusion of the host state’s Commissioner for Information became one of the most talked-about controversies surrounding the summit.
Had the organizers involved the Commissioner from the planning stage, his vast experience, administrative competence, and institutional knowledge could have significantly improved the coordination of the event. His contributions might have transformed the summit into a model gathering and eliminated many of the shortcomings that attracted widespread criticism.
Ironically, those blaming the Commissioner for his absence are not being fair. Such accusations only strengthen the belief that certain individuals are pursuing a carefully orchestrated agenda aimed at discrediting him. According to available information, the Commissioner was not invited to an event held within his own official domain. In keeping with professional ethics and protocol, he chose not to attend an event from which he had been deliberately excluded. The consequences of that decision. and of the organizers’ actions, were evident for everyone to see.
As for those working tirelessly to push the Commissioner into political irrelevance, they should understand that their alleged campaign has become increasingly obvious. More importantly, the Governor has continued to demonstrate confidence in him. Beyond that, the Commissioner has continued to receive recognition and commendation for his dedication, professionalism, and unwavering commitment to the responsibilities entrusted to him.
History has repeatedly shown that competence, professionalism, and integrity ultimately outlast conspiracy, manipulation, and political scheming.